~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stop Global Warming by Getting Rid of US Babies

I more and more think that all of the steps being demanded of us regarding global warming are all nonsense. If data someday conclusively shows the earth is truly warming, then with technology advancing so rapidly, surely we will be far better tooled to deal with it a couple of decades from now. The important point for now is that we fund research into technologies (like this or this or this) that might in the future pay off regarding reducing any unwanted global warming. The draconian steps being demanded of us today, like cap & trade, will hurt the US economy while having an insignificant impact on global warming. We are simply not equipped today to deal with the problem of global warming (assuming that the problem is real and matters much).

But of course among those demanding immediate and major actions to attempt to reduce global warming, nothing seems good enough. Fortunately, a new study tells these folks exactly what they can do as individuals to reduce global warming electronic cigarette china. The New York Times summarizes the new study:

Having children is the surest way to send your carbon footprint soaring, according to a new study from statisticians at Oregon State University.

The study found that having a child has an impact that far outweighs that of other energy-saving behaviors.

Take, for example, a hypothetical American woman who switches to a more fuel-efficient car, drives less, recycles, installs more efficient light bulbs, and replaces her refrigerator and windows with energy-saving models. If she had two children, the researchers found, her carbon legacy would eventually rise to nearly 40 times what she had saved by those actions.

“Clearly, the potential savings from reduced reproduction are huge compared to the savings that can be achieved by changes in lifestyle,” the report states.

The impact of children varies dramatically depending on geography: An American woman who has a baby will generate nearly seven times the carbon footprint of that of a Chinese woman who has a child, the study found.

11 Responses to “Stop Global Warming by Getting Rid of US Babies”

  1. mike Says:

    “Carbon Legacy”, that’s a new one…

    Let’s all just kill ourselves now. You know, for the planet.

  2. mike Says:

    “Let’s all just kill ourselves now. You know, for the planet.”

    PS: You first.

  3. Roxan Says:

    That wouldn’t apply to illegal aliens and immigrants, would it? Illegal aliens in particular seem to be encouraged to have as many children as possible through: (Free Births, WIC etc benefits, FREE school and FREE breakfasts/lunches) and there’s the DREAM Act.

    Furthermore, politicians adamately refuse to address the 14th Amendment and revise it….It was meant for freed slaves, not automatic Anchor/Jackpot babies born to illegal aliens…and what’s not to like about this arrangement? It’s mighty appealing to illegal alien mothers and as long as this magnet remains, it will draw more pregnant illegal alien women. (simple as that).

    The 1986 Amnesty didn’t help anything and now our politicians are determined to bring another amnesty….McCaine and Kennedy tried twice in the recent past to cram this down our throats.

    And, how long before this next Amnesty is passed before there is a call for another by the greedy corporatists/traitorous-compliant polticians belong to such groups as the CFR and Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergs & 1-World Order Proponents (all the same really) so they can finally get the NAU (North American Union).

    Do you think the hoodwinked legal citizens are not presently paying any attention to this disgusting falsity, (who were young in the 60s/70) who were told constantly by PAUL EHRLICK & OTHER ENVIRONMENTALISTS who “CLAIMED” that our environment was in dire trouble, that we had to have ) 0-POPULATION GROWTH—that many of us listened and either had 0 children or 2 children, maximum?—–and that at the same time, we weren’t told about the 1965 IMMIGRATION BILL or AZTLAN/ANAHUAC that led many Mexican women to have as many children as possible to outpopulate the (whites) so they could “reclaim lost Mexican Territory” or even reclaim the entire Americas and boot everyone else out?

    Also, Didn’t Al Gore and Ted Turner have a few kids too many?

    Don’t the business practices of the U.S. (to flood our country with immigrants-both legal and illegal to drive down our wages) have any responsibility to this mess and why don’t the environmentalists care about that? As a matter of fact, why don’t they care about any of this?

  4. Roxan Says:

    I hate to be long winded, but here’s some more things the (global warmers and depopulation Earth Justice/Day/Hour people & the Rockefellers & the Club or Rome don’t care about) and NEVER mention.

    LIST:
    1. Chem Trails.
    2. HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)—Both Chem Trails and HAARP contribute to weather control {so it is thought}…Please research it.
    3. Depleted Uranium/White Phosphorous from our (perpetual wars).
    4. GM Terminator seeds.
    5. Fluoridated water.

    NEVER mentioned are those ill with:
    6. Agent Orange.
    7. Gulf War Syndrome.
    8. MCS (multiple chemical sensitivity).

    It’s strange how the people ill with AO, GWS & MCS are either completely ignored by the falsimedia or every once in a while to (Remind the Sheeple), they bring out some “expert” to tell the Sheeple audience that there’s nothing wrong with us and we just have psychological issues that must be dealt with.

    In the case of MCS, they NEVER talk about Martin Pall’s work or that there might be a damaged CNS (Central Nervous System) or a damaged/defective blood-brain barrier.

  5. Roxan Says:

    Okay, there’s a lot to say. Anyway, yes, overpopulation should be addressed and there’s ridiculous cases like Octomom and the love affair with John & Kate +8 and multiple births from doctor tampering and religous beliefs, but I think birth control and knowledge goes a long ways and forced abortion should never be used.

    AND to completely ignore the high immigration rate issues (both legal and illegal) is just beyond stupid.

    Especially when we’re constantly reminded about water shortages and energy/infrastructure problems….Wouldn’t any measures taken to limit & ration water/energy, etc be completely negated if we just continue to let more people pour in?

  6. Roxan Says:

    Hmm, Since China is doing most of the manufacturing and the U.S. is not, who exactly has the bigger “carbon footprint?” WHy is this issue ignored?

  7. LinLin16 Says:

    “LiberalsRidiots”: you stay up late at night putting such irrational thoughts together? go to sleep man. you and your kind started a war that’s killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people, including our own kids in uniform and now you just repeat what you heard on FoxNews forgetting that you are proudly responsible for mass death in iraq. Ignorant and immoral is what you and your kind are.

  8. Peter Says:

    Pat Kittle says: “Human that don’t exist have ZERO ecological impact.” That’s not true. Humans are the cutting edge of the anti-entropy of this sector (at least) of the cosmos. No humans means entropy until this Earth (and this whole solar system are cosmic garbage.

    More (rationally creative and moral) human beings!!! That way the galaxy has a chance to reveal clearly its divine foundation.

    (cf. the work of V.I Vernadsky and LaRouche).

  9. Latest global warming news – nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » Stop Global Warming by Getting … Says:

    […] nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » Stop Global Warming by Getting … […]

  10. Highlander Says:

    Down with illegal hispanic aliens! Contact FAIRUS.org, Numbers USA, The FIRE Coalition, The Minutemen Militia and join our fight! Illegal immigration is causing crime, gangs, overcrowding and drugs in the U.S.. NO MORE AMNESTIES , NO MORE SANCTUARY CITIES FOR THOSE THAT VIOLATE OUR NATION’S IMMIGRATION LAWS!!!!!!!!!!

  11. David S Says:

    The Chinese already address this with their one child policy. Way ahead of the curve.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.