~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A Betrayal of the American Working Class

workers
With interest groups allied with the Democrats making competing demands, many Democrats in Congress must sometimes feel confused. Nowhere is this more evident than in the immigration debate. On one hand, the gut response of most Democrats is to welcome Hispanic illegal workers, as Hispanic advocacy groups demand, and resist substantial new measures to stem the flow of illegal people crossing the southern border. But this directly conflicts with the interests of the core group whom Democrats have historically tried to loyally represent: The American working class. On the immigration issue, Democrats have turned their backs on their core constituency. This is the ultimate triumph of politically correct thinking, where the group declared the bigger victim always wins out in policy disputes.

For years now, Democrats should have been vociferously demanding a shutdown of illegal immigration over the southern border, but they have simply been silent on this. Similarly, when employers easily hire illegal workers at bargain wages with little worries of being arrested - to the detriment of American workers - again the Democrats have been silent.

Since the New Deal, Democrats had steadfastly put helping working class Americans at the top of their policy agenda. Whether their supported policies actually helped or hurt them is a matter of debate. But that they intended to help them is clear. They supported labor unions, unemployment insurance, minimum wage laws, stricter labor laws, a progressive income tax, Social Security, Medicare and so on. All of these were targeted to help those doing the demanding, daily labor of the working class. The interests of the working class were looked out for during their working years, during periods of unemployment, if they were injured on the job, and during retirement.

Factory workers, construction workers, service sector workers, and manual laborers in general - these were the core constituents that Democrats strived to protect.

In the 1960s the Democratic Party began paying attention, not just to the broad working class that was gaining moderate affluence, but also to the working poor. And as the Civil Rights movement reached its peak, the plight of black Americans became a large concern for Democrats. Black Americans were largely members of the working class too, just poorer, so this only strengthened the Democrat’s core constituency. There were no policy conflicts here.

After the 1960s however, a new perspective became more and more central in the minds of most Democrats. Many groups in society became designated as permanent victims, blacks being a main group. With a legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, there were plenty of grounds for this outlook. Policies to help the working class were still of key importance - but never if they were declared to undercut blacks as a group.

This idea of separateness of some groups, as victim classes, took on a strong ideological cast and the thinking spread deeper. Blacks were victims, women were victims, native Americans were victims, and other minority groups were gaining victim status too.

Permanent victim status meant a group’s members were abused historically and are still mistreated daily. All proposed policies were first analyzed on how they helped these victims. The term discrimination became the term to describe how the victim groups were mistreated. Any hint of discrimination in new policies meant that racism or sexism was at work - and these policies were rejected and denounced.

The fight against perceived discrimination, whether it was due to institutional racism or racism of individuals, trumped other concerns when taking positions on social policy issues. In fact, this became so pronounced that a new phrase was coined: Political Correctness. Every Democratic politician wanted to be seen as being politically correct, even if they didn‘t use this term to describe themselves.

Looking at the immigration reform issue from the politically correct point of view, regarding low-income illegal Hispanic immigrants, the position to take is clear: These illegal immigrants, especially since the great bulk of them are brown-skinned Hispanics, must be supported because of the racists who don’t want them here and because they are mistreated by American institutions.

The fact that the illegal immigrants are taking jobs away from working class Americans somehow gets overlooked. Where these immigrants don’t directly take jobs, they drive down wages. Never have Democrats so blatantly turned their backs on working class Americans. In fact, it would be hard to devise policies any more anti-working class than allowing impoverished foreigners, living in Third World conditions, to come by the millions to the U.S. to seek jobs.

The Democrats have inadvertently agreed to the worst form of Corporate Welfare. This welfare is the wink and nod system of allowing a whole new sector of the working class - a replacement class - to move to America. Really cheap labor, super-flexible workers that employers can dump anytime, and no benefits required - the perfect new labor force for some business owners striving to maximize their profits.

Disturbing also is that illegal immigrants are making poor black men obsolete. The welfare state has already arguably stolen their women - no family lives for them. Now the illegal immigrants are taking their jobs. Many black American men have historically done dirty, manual labor jobs and often worked for low wages - but they have their limits. They are Americans too - with expectations of reasonably decent wages. But when it comes to a bidding war for who will work for the lowest wages, illegal immigrants used to making $1 an hour in their native countries will win every time.

Over 50% of black men in their 20’s are jobless, and 72% of black men in their 20’s who are high school drop-outs are jobless. No greater shame should hang over the Democratic Party than this.

Democrats still have time to get it right on immigration. They should make three issues paramount: securing the southern border to prevent more replacement workers from coming in, get very strict with employers who hire illegal immigrants, and denounce every guest worker program for low-skill labor.

Democrats should be passionate, very vocal, and out front on this - not being dragged along by Republicans and opinion polls.

Demand that American businesses make do with the American working class, including the American working poor. Will some businesses have to pay more? Yes. Too damn bad.

If the Democratic Party is going salvage any integrity regarding immigration reform - or even any credibility as a party - they had better very quickly get back on the side of working class Americans.

9 Responses to “A Betrayal of the American Working Class”

  1. ratsnest Says:

    “not being dragged along by Republicans and opinion polls.”
    I think if you take a look at most conservative polls, you will find that conservatives in general are largely against amnesty, guest workers, and FOR ENFORCING THE BORDER AND CORPORATE HIRING OF ILLEGALS. Bush and company have had their heads up their arses on this issue right along. This isn’t just about American jobs and further burdening the taxpayer…it’s about homeland security as well.

  2. Scott Kirwin Says:

    In Virginia, one of the Democratic challengers for Senate is Harris Miller, a lobbyist who for over a decade worked to offshore jobs and to dump foreign labor in America to drive down wages. I can’t believe the party of Roosevelt would even allow this man to claim the Democratic mantle let alone run for public office.

    Has the VA Democratic party gone nuts?

    Miller’s challenger is Jim Webb, a man in the mold of Mark Warner who served his country in the Marine Corps. This is the kind of man the Dems need to bring back the Reagan Democrats who left the party when Clinton retired from the scene.

  3. Macbrvs94 Says:

    Dan, you write: “Demand that American businesses make do with the American working class, including the American working poor. Will some businesses have to pay more? Yes. Too damn bad.”

    I was arguing with a friend about this the other day. His argument was that illegal labor lowers the prices on things like groceries and housing and that this is a net benefit for the middle class. But, as you allude to here, that’s not necessarily the case. The price of a product, a tomato, a house, etc. is set at what the market will pay. A reduction in the cost of the inputs (labor) results in higher profits for the producer, not a lower price for the consumer. Unless the producer is feeling generous and decides to pass the savings on, but why would he do that? This is the lie that the Wall Street Journal editorial page has been pushing down conservative’s throats for the past twenty year.

    They tell us that illegals are good for us while we lose our jobs, health care costs rise, our schools slow down to teach non-english speaking kids, all while Tamar Jacoby’s 401k keeps going up and up and up….

    It’s kind of an aside, but I still think it’s important to note.

  4. fletch Says:

    In fact, it would be hard to devise policies any more anti-working class than allowing impoverished foreigners, living in Third World conditions, to come by the millions to the U.S. to seek jobs.

    Compare/Contrast with the Dem Party “fair trade” movement that tried to reject CAFTA, and is still bitching about NAFTA…

    Then: “Every other country must have the exact same wage, labor, and environmental laws as the US, or it is an incentive for our employers and manufacturers to ‘outsource’- seeking a better deal in a ‘third world’ country w/ cheap labor or unenforced laws- rather than hiring Americans.”

    Now: “There are Jobs Americans Won’t Do, so we need to ignore the laws and bring the cheap labor here(and hopefully more than half will vote for us after we give them their citizenship)!”
    =========================================================

    Of course, after we ‘legalize’ the current 12 million “undocumented workers” and set them on the road to citizenship- they will then be Americans!

    **Shit!**

    There are still all those Jobs Americans Won’t Do

    How many more illegals will we be needing?

  5. nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » Wrong Link Says:

    [...] amas Media, someone there accidentally linked you to my About Me page. Sorry about that. Here is the link that they meant to give. This entry was posted on Wednes [...]

  6. Gay Patriot Says:

    Democrats Rejecting New Deal Coalition for Illegal Coalition

    I’ve been thinking how interesting it is that the Democrats have decided to abandon their political allegiance to the African-American community in favor of a pact with Illegal Immigrants who they see as a potential path out of their current ele…

  7. nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » How to Get Carpenters On the Cheap Says:

    [...] s leave home. More replacement workers are on their way. Too bad the Democrats have been silent on this issue for years. Seems odd that those trying to limit the flow of illegal replacement workers, whic [...]

  8. nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » Troops, Fences, and Border Security Says:

    [...] Democrats would have ever been out front on proposing aggressive border security steps for fear of being politically incorrect. But now that the issue has broken into the mainstream, they are indulging in [...]

  9. Union Payback - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum Says:

    [...] American Worker The American Dream is Burning - Workers Betrayed by Globalization and Free Trade nospeedbumps.com » Blog Archive » A Betrayal of the American Working Class __________________ "We have an obligation and a responsibility to be investing in our [...]

Leave a Reply